30 September 2014 – Summary of CHC hearing.
CHC
-
陈绍云的辩护律师力图证实检方所称的利用教会资金进行返程交易其实为过渡贷款。
-
Sharon Tan’s lawyer seeks to show that what the prosecution calls a round-tripping of church funds was really a bridging loan.
-
检方控诉陈绍云的一项主要论点为预付租金许可协议乃是掩盖教会资金用来赎回思创与Firna债券的计划。今天早上,资深律师加南拉美斯证实该计划发生的真实背景。
-
CHC’s retainer of Xtron is given clarity at re-examination this afternoon, as senior counsel Kannan Ramesh sets about unpicking the prosecution’s tangled web of accusations.
-
CHC付与思创的聘用金于今日下午再问询中得以澄清;资深律师加南拉美斯旨在解开检方交织纠结的控诉之网。
-
检方力图证实Baker Tilly审计师对于ARLA与SOF交易资金如何用来赎回思创与Firna债券的途径不知情。
-
26 September 2014 – Summary of CHC hearing.
-
检方控诉Firna董事无法支配资金,因为赎回Firna债券的资金出自教会。
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Wahju Hanafi Made Independent Decision, Says Sharon Tan
Prosecution alleges that the Firna director had no control over funds, as the funds to redeem the Firna bonds came from the church.
A pillar of the prosecution’s case against Sharon Tan has been that the Advance Rental Licensing Agreement was used to cover up the fact that church funds were used to redeem the Xtron and Firna bonds. This morning, senior counsel Kannan Ramesh established the true context of the plan.
City Harvest Trial: Role Of ARLA And SOF Transactions In Redemption Exercise Examined
The prosecution sought to establish that the Baker Tilly auditors were not informed about how the funds involved in the ARLA and SOF transactions were routed around to complete the redemption of the Xtron and Firna bonds.