检方对事情一概而论、无法提出有力证据，并且无视与其举证相冲突的事件时间表——这些就是辩方“无需答辩”的呈请论点。
Tag:
Crossover Project
-
9 April 2014 – Summary of Day 2 of CHC “no case to answer” submission.
-
CHC Trial: Defense Reminds Court Church Money Was Used For Church’s Purpose; Suggests Prosecution Has Not Satisfied Charges
-
辩方今日下午继续提出“无需答辩”之申请，并指出检方缺少委托与支配的因素，加上第一份情报报告（FIR）的疑团，以及检方证人无法指证思创债券有任何“虚假”成分。
-
法庭继续审理CHC案件；辩方律师提出“无需答辩”之口述呈请。
-
8 April 2014 – Summary of Day 1 of CHC “no case to answer” submission.
-
The CHC trial continued with defense lawyers presenting oral submissions for “no case to answer”.
-
Prosecution in re-examination invites witness to guess intentions behind defendants’ emails. Defense objects.
-
辩方律师试图证实，审计师拥有所有相关资料，能以深入调查建堂基金的使用是否正当。
-
Defense lawyer sought to show that auditors had all the relevant information for a comprehensive examination of the proper use of building fund.
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
CHC Trial: Prosecution Created A “Cut And Paste” Conspiracy, Says Defense
The defense continued this afternoon to press for “no case to answer”, citing missing elements of entrustment and dominion, coupled with the mysteries surrounding the FIR and the inability of the prosecution’s witnesses to testify of the “sham” aspect of Xtron bonds.
检方进行再质询时，邀请证人猜测被告在电邮内容背后的企图；辩方立即提出抗议。