City Harvest Church Trial: 02 Apr 2015
John Lam
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Collective Decision By Board To Ensure Bond Legitimacy, Says Tan
Tan Ye Peng maintains that the church board, along with its fund manager Chew Eng Han, were responsible for ensuring the legitimacy of the bonds.
-
陈一平坚持,冯道清曾在一次会议上建议被告在代表CHC与思创之间的敏感关系时需保持低调。
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: What’s Wrong With CHC Working To Achieve Win-Win Situation, Asks Tan
Tan Ye Peng maintains that it was at a meeting with Foong Daw Ching that the auditor advised discretion in representing the sensitive relationship between CHC and Xtron.
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Tan: Xtron’s Dual Purpose Was Known To Board And Auditor
While the prosecution alleged that the auditor was not “explicitly told” that Xtron was a special purpose vehicle, defendant Tan Ye Peng maintained that Foong Daw Ching had knowledge of the dual purpose of investments into Xtron and Firna.
-
将建堂基金奉献退还给何清伟和其他会友,是奉献者自愿并经过董事批准的事,而不是为了隐瞒任何实情。
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Tan: Building Fund Refunds Approved By Board, Put Into Xtron To Support Mission Of Crossover
The refund of members’ building fund offerings, including Wahju Hanafi’s was not meant to conceal anything, but had been done willingly by the givers and approved by the board.
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Crossover Project Would Have Been Funded Directly If Not For Roland Poon Saga
Tan Ye Peng explained to the court that funding structure for the Crossover Project changed because the church leadership wanted to avoid “future trip-ups” like the one triggered by Roland Poon.
-
26 March 2015 – Summary of CHC hearing.
-
陈一平在庭上论述自己看到教会找到家甚感开心,但却因为跨界计划突然结束而失去全球宣教的机会感到可惜。
尽管检方控诉被告未曾“明确告诉”审计师思创乃是特殊目的公司,被告陈一平仍坚持冯道清对思创与Firna投资之双重目的完全知情。
陈一平在庭上解释跨界计划的资助架构改变因为教会领袖希望避免类似方瑞家事件在未来再次发生。