Former church fund manager defends the legality of his structuring of the “sham” bond investments and ARLA transaction.
Tag:
Serina Wee
-
周英汉第二日出庭答辩——他提出该审讯已详细探讨的问题，并发表自己的看法。
-
On his second day on the stand, Chew Eng Han raised issues already dealt with at length over the course of this trial, providing his own take.
-
城市丰收教会前基金经理周英汉今天出庭作证；他在其证词中说明拟定债券投资背后的根据，并表示该投资并非虚假。
-
这一阶段审讯有诸多问题浮现——尤其当康希提供证词并接受交叉质询问时，本报在此略解一二。
-
Many questions were raised during this tranche, particularly during the testimony and cross-examination of Kong Hee. City News Weekly addresses some of these.
-
自周英汉前代表律师邱甲立资深律师质问首份情报报告为何之后，斯尼华申资深律师迄今仍然继续追究此事。慈善总监向商业事务局进行怎样的“沟通”导致他们对城市丰收教会展开调查？
-
The first three of the six defendants—John Lam, Kong Hee and Sharon Tan—have taken the stand to bear witness to what they believe is the truth in the ongoing case against them. City News Weekly takes stock.
-
六位被告中的首三位——林岭恒、康希与陈绍云——已出庭作证陈述他们所信的本案真相。本报一一详解。
-
03 October 2014 – Summary of CHC hearing.
City Harvest Church’s former fund manager, Chew Eng Han began his testimony by rationalising the bond investments he created, which he says are not sham.
Since Chew Eng Han’s former lawyer senior counsel Michael Khoo raised the question of what actually constituted the First Information Report, senior counsel N Sreenivasan has been pursuing the matter. What was this “communication” from the COC that sparked off the CAD investigation into City Harvest Church?