No church funds could have been invested except with the approval by the church board, the court heard from Chew Eng Han’s cross-examination of Sharon Tan.
Sun Ho
-
周试图证实审计师对于预付租金许可协议的相关交易知情。
-
Chew sought to establish that auditors knew about the transactions surrounding the Advance Rental Licensing Agreement.
-
陈绍云今日下午的证词与周英汉试图提出的吻合——主要论点为其投资该时皆为教会的利益进行。
-
加南拉美斯资深律师针对其当事人的控状结束主问。
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Sharon Tan “Never Had Any Intention To Cause Church Any Loss”
Senior counsel Kannan Ramesh ended his examination-in-chief by addressing his client’s charges.
-
陈绍云解释周英汉提议使用预付租金赎回债券和取得地产的流程经过CHC董事核准。
-
16 September 2014 – Summary of CHC hearing.
-
财务经理陈绍云今天下午的证词使人进一步了解设立预付租金许可协议(Advanced Rental Licensed Agreement)的原因和迫切性;检方宣称ARLA为“虚假”。
-
The testimony of finance manager Sharon Tan this afternoon revealed new insight into the reason—and urgency—for the creation of the Advance Rental License Agreement (ARLA), which the prosecution has labeled “sham.”
City Harvest Trial: Cross-Examination Emphasizes Genuineness Of Investments.
Sharon Tan’s testimony this afternoon was consistent with what Chew Eng Han tried to put forth, mainly that the investments were in the best interests of the church at material time.
Sharon Tan explains that Chew Eng Han’s proposed process of using advance rental to redeem bonds and acquire property was approved by the CHC board.