法庭继续审理CHC案件；辩方律师提出“无需答辩”之口述呈请。
Tag:
Sun Ho
-
8 April 2014 – Summary of Day 1 of CHC “no case to answer” submission.
-
The CHC trial continued with defense lawyers presenting oral submissions for “no case to answer”.
-
检方进行再质询时，邀请证人猜测被告在电邮内容背后的企图；辩方立即提出抗议。
-
辩方律师试图证实，审计师拥有所有相关资料，能以深入调查建堂基金的使用是否正当。
-
Defense lawyer sought to show that auditors had all the relevant information for a comprehensive examination of the proper use of building fund.
-
Baker Tilly 审计摘要报告显示，审计师在签署审计账目之前，关于各项因素…
-
审计师程瑜相信债券认购是核准的投资；收入的使用也符合定下的宗旨。
-
Auditor Tiang Yi was satisfied that bond subscription was authorized investment and…
-
在交叉询问中，冯道清是否有履行管理合伙…
Prosecution in re-examination invites witness to guess intentions behind defendants’ emails. Defense objects.
Baker Tilly audit summary report shows that auditors had factored in Xtron’s status as a going concern and…